So you don't have to sift through the whole video, I'm betting the jist of it is, in any 'final product' situation, like a mix or a gig, you should avoid anything much over 44.1 like the plague. Most samples at 44.1 sound "wrong" more on many systems, pro'ly, but still. ![]() And the mid-range is decidedly sounding "wrong" in a not so great, but *not* extremely ugly or horribly intrudung way. There's cool sound variations I would think are hard to obtain from a studio recording of a real piano, and there are interesting settings which work, like tuning the octave stretch and setting a werkmeister tuning, but as the previous version: I got bored after a few minutes. More than "some" variation in the deepness of the tone I cannot discern. Well, it's nice, the german grand sounds different from the other models, and of course the good part of the Physical Modelling is there's some "life" and variation to the sound, when compared to samples. ![]() #Pianoteq 5 large room effect 32 bit#Having been interested from the making side of PM I thought I'd download the demo version on my I7 Linux system, and I hooked it up with my PC3 as controller (and to quickly compare some sounds I'd made), good working "jack" as ouput mechanism, running in 32 bit floating point with 24 bit converters at 192 kHz sampling frequency (which the demo allows), and monitoring through my main audio system, in "late at night mode". ![]() I am very conviced playing "the real thing" in a nice studio is a different experience, period.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |